Politeness is treating others with respect and courtesy of your own volition.
Political correctness is being forced by a shame culture to treat people how the world thinks they should be treated.
It isn't polite if it's forced. It's disingenuous, and dishonest. It's the same difference between being charitable, and being taxed.
Thursday, May 24, 2018
Political Correctness
Wednesday, February 15, 2012
9th Amendment
The Ninth Amendment reads:
The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
This amendment was skillfully worded to avoid any misunderstanding about the Bill of Rights, because under the law, when you have an itemized list in a legal document, and do not include everything else, it is presumed that you intended to leave out or waive what was not included in the list. Therefore, you legally forfeit the ones you did not include in the list. This amendment was a clear-cut disclaimer of any such interpretation; that is, the people did not intend to exclude anything that was not mentioned in the Bill of Rights. There is no implied or inherent waiver of the rights not mentioned or listed therein.
The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
This amendment was skillfully worded to avoid any misunderstanding about the Bill of Rights, because under the law, when you have an itemized list in a legal document, and do not include everything else, it is presumed that you intended to leave out or waive what was not included in the list. Therefore, you legally forfeit the ones you did not include in the list. This amendment was a clear-cut disclaimer of any such interpretation; that is, the people did not intend to exclude anything that was not mentioned in the Bill of Rights. There is no implied or inherent waiver of the rights not mentioned or listed therein.
Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Tenth Amendment
Many people believe either Congress, the President, or the Supreme Court can do anything they please if there is no specific restriction mentioned in the Constitution on the particular issue in question. That is a false assumption. Anything the Constitution does not specify or clearly imply is an automatic restriction against the federal government, because the constitutional authority doesn't exist if it is not specifically granted by the Constitution.
Opponents of this view refer to the Article I, Section 8, Clause 18, which authorizes Congress:
To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for caring into execution the foregoing powers, and all powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States or in any department or officer thereof.
They contend that the "necessary and proper" clause gives Congress virtually an unlimited power to make any law that legislative body deems necessary and proper, regardless of anything else. This is typical of how statements are taken out of context [like the General Welfare Clause] to justify a position that flies in the face of the whole spirit and original intent of the Constitution. Congress only had the implied authority to carry out the designated "foregoing" powers, specifically enumerated in Article I, Section 8. They could not otherwise adopt any laws that would effectively amend the Constitution. Article V of the Constitution makes it clear that that power was "reserved to the states" [Tenth Amendment].
Opponents of this view refer to the Article I, Section 8, Clause 18, which authorizes Congress:
To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for caring into execution the foregoing powers, and all powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States or in any department or officer thereof.
They contend that the "necessary and proper" clause gives Congress virtually an unlimited power to make any law that legislative body deems necessary and proper, regardless of anything else. This is typical of how statements are taken out of context [like the General Welfare Clause] to justify a position that flies in the face of the whole spirit and original intent of the Constitution. Congress only had the implied authority to carry out the designated "foregoing" powers, specifically enumerated in Article I, Section 8. They could not otherwise adopt any laws that would effectively amend the Constitution. Article V of the Constitution makes it clear that that power was "reserved to the states" [Tenth Amendment].
Monday, January 30, 2012
A Cry out for Rememberance
It is a remembrance of the founding principles of our beloved country. a
A remembrance of the men who's blood was spilled for individual freedom and liberty rather than the collective interests of the masses.
With each passing day, a forgetful fog of acceptance is passively accepted by the citizens of this land, where we ignorantly begin to think the government is above the individual. As Ronald Reagan once said; "We are a nation that has a government, not the other way around. Our government has no power except that granted it by the people."
So as we press forward in the cause of freedom let us take heart, let us have courage, let us be of a sound mind. For if we are to sustain the freedoms that our Founding Fathers penned for us many generations ago, we must renew with vigor the same commitment to principle that they who bravely fought once had.
A remembrance of the men who's blood was spilled for individual freedom and liberty rather than the collective interests of the masses.
With each passing day, a forgetful fog of acceptance is passively accepted by the citizens of this land, where we ignorantly begin to think the government is above the individual. As Ronald Reagan once said; "We are a nation that has a government, not the other way around. Our government has no power except that granted it by the people."
So as we press forward in the cause of freedom let us take heart, let us have courage, let us be of a sound mind. For if we are to sustain the freedoms that our Founding Fathers penned for us many generations ago, we must renew with vigor the same commitment to principle that they who bravely fought once had.
Tuesday, June 1, 2010
Saturday, October 17, 2009
Parties
Parties. Whether Democrat, Republican, Independent, Centrist, Constitutional, or even if you just don't want to affiliate yourself with any of them. In the end we're all going to have are differences. So why can't some individuals comprehend that there will always be disagreements, so let bygones be bygones and agree to disagree so that we can actually work together to get things done. For united we stand, but divided we fall.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)